Law of corresponding states: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎References: Added a recent publication)
m (→‎References: Added a recent publication)
 
Line 44: Line 44:
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4926464  P. Orea, A. Romero-Martínez, E. Basurto, C. A. Varga and G. Odriozola "Corresponding states law for a generalized Lennard-Jones potential", Journal of Chemical Physics '''143''' 024504 (2015)]
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4926464  P. Orea, A. Romero-Martínez, E. Basurto, C. A. Varga and G. Odriozola "Corresponding states law for a generalized Lennard-Jones potential", Journal of Chemical Physics '''143''' 024504 (2015)]
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4953617  Volker C. Weiss "Corresponding-states behavior of an ionic model fluid with variable dispersion interactions", Journal of Chemical Physics '''144''' 234502 (2016)]
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4953617  Volker C. Weiss "Corresponding-states behavior of an ionic model fluid with variable dispersion interactions", Journal of Chemical Physics '''144''' 234502 (2016)]
*[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4975778 Malte Fugel and Volker C. Weiss "A corresponding-states analysis of the liquid-vapor equilibrium properties of common water models", Journal of Chemical Physics '''146''' 064505 (2017)]


[[category: equations of state]]
[[category: equations of state]]

Latest revision as of 14:03, 16 February 2017

The law of corresponding states is an empirical law which encapsulates the finding that the equations of state for many real gases are remarkably similar when they are expressed in terms of reduced temperatures (), pressures, () and volumes (), where the subscript represents the value of the property at the critical point. This law was first described by Johannes Diderik van der Waals in his 1873 thesis, and forms the subject of a paper by him in 1913 [1].

Assumptions[edit]

Pitzer [2] produced a list of assumptions in order for the law of corresponding states to apply. This list was later modified by Guggenheim [3]. These are:

  1. There is negligible difference between Fermi–Dirac statistics and Bose–Einstein statistics for the system (i.e. the system behaves classically).
  2. The effect of quantisation of the translational degrees of freedom is negligible (i.e. the system behaves classically).
  3. The molecules are spherically symmetrical, either actually or by virtue of rapid and free rotation.
  4. The intramolecular degrees of freedom are assumed to be completely independent of the volume per molecule.
  5. The potential energy will be taken as a function only of the various intermolecular distances.
  6. The potential energy for a pair of molecules can be written as where is the intermolecular distance, and and are characteristic constants, and is a universal function.

Examples[edit]

For argon, krypton, nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide and methane one has [3]

(for pressure measured in atmospheres, and volume in cm3mole-1)

For neon, argon, and oxygen one has [3]

where is the Boyle temperature.

For neon, argon, krypton,and xenon one has [3]

where is the triple point.

Acentric factor[edit]

The acentric factor [4] is defined in terms of the vapour pressure at . It has been shown that a number of substances have the behavior if they share the same acentric factor.

Colloids[edit]

The law of corresponding states has been extended to suspensions of spherical colloids that interact via a pair potential by Noro and Frenkel [5].

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Related material