|
|
Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| where <math>\theta</math> is the angle between the molecular symmetry axis and the [[director]]. <math>\overline P_2</math> | | where <math>\theta</math> is the angle between the molecular symmetry axis and the [[director]]. <math>\overline P_2</math> |
| is the [[Order parameters | uniaxial order parameter]]. | | is the [[Order parameters | uniaxial order parameter]]. |
| Maier and Saupe Theory
| |
| Aim is to calculate S as function of T.
| |
| Maier and Saupe (1960) anisotropic attraction
| |
| Onsager (1949) anisotropic repulsion
| |
| We will look at MS theory and then consider its strengths and weaknesses.
| |
| (i)
| |
| Simplest attractive interaction between two polarizable rods. Instantaneous dipole interacts with induced dipole.
| |
| ⎟⎠⎞⎜⎝⎛−=21cos23)(),(12212121212ββrurU
| |
| β12
| |
| 2
| |
| 1
| |
| r12
| |
| (ii)
| |
| Too difficult to consider interaction of every molecule with every other molecule so we construct an average potential energy function that one molecule feels due to immersion in a sea of other similar molecules. Mean field approximation. )(cos)(21cos23)(1)()(21cos23)(222222iiiiiiiiPVASUVASUVUSUUββββββββ−=⎟⎠⎞⎜⎝⎛−−=∝∝⎟⎠⎞⎜⎝⎛−−∝
| |
| i.e. potential proportional to cos squared of angle
| |
| and order parameter
| |
| and density squared
| |
| n
| |
| βi
| |
| A defines strength of potential. Ignores fluctuations and SRO
| |
| (iv)
| |
| Now calculate orientational distribution function: angle. azimuthal theis and director theand axis longmolecular ebetween th anglepolar theis wheresin where1)(020)()(αβαβββππββddeZeZfiiTkUTkUiBiiBii∫∫−−==
| |
| (v)
| |
| The order parameter can now be calculated using the method outlined in lecture 2. The order parameter is just the average value of )(cos2β
| |
| P. That is)cos(2βPS=.
| |
| In more detail… αβββαββββαββββππππππddTkVASPddPTkVASPddPfSBBsin)(cosexpsin)(cos)(cosexpsin)(cos)(020220220220220∫∫∫∫∫∫⎟⎟⎠⎞⎜⎜⎝⎛⎟⎟⎠⎞⎜⎜⎝⎛==
| |
| This is just an equation with S on both sides. It is tricky to solve because S appears within an integral but solutions can be found using the following method. ()()ATkmVSTkVASmdxmxdxxmxSdxTkVxASPdxxPTkVxASPSdxTkVxASPdxxPTkVxASPSBBBBBB221022102102221022112221122or where21expexp23)(exp)()(exp)(exp)()(exp==−=∴⎟⎟⎠⎞⎜⎜⎝⎛⎟⎟⎠⎞⎜⎜⎝⎛=⎟⎟⎠⎞⎜⎜⎝⎛⎟⎟⎠⎞⎜⎜⎝⎛=∫∫∫∫∫∫−−
| |
| (vi)
| |
| Two simultaneous equations in S and m. Integral may be done numerically and equations solved “graphically”. Slope of straight line is proportional to T.
| |
| The results are:
| |
| Tmax
| |
| 0
| |
| T
| |
| S
| |
| m
| |
| low T
| |
| high T
| |
| 1
| |
| -0.5
| |
| S
| |
| )/(22284.02maxBkVAT×=
| |
| At high T (ie T > Tmax) there is only 1 solution, S = 0
| |
| At low T (ie T < Tmax) there are 3 self consistent solutions. S=0, S>0 and S<0
| |
| (vii)
| |
| Which one has lowest free energy? The one with lowest free energy! Use : Helmholtz free energy = energy – T × entropy Σ
| |
| −=TU
| |
| Recall from Statistical Mechanics:
| |
| Probability of the system being in a state with energy Er : 1 and ==Σ−rrTkErPZePBr mean energy of system, UrrrEPΣ= entropy of system, rrrBPPklnΣ−=Σ
| |
| (viii)
| |
| Average energy of a molecule : )(cosS using and function,on distributi over the averagean represent where)(cos)(cos)(2222222ββββPVASPVASPVASUUii=−=−=−== Energy of phase of N molecules: 2221VASNU−= (Note the half)
| |
| (ix)
| |
| Entropy of a molecule is –kB times average of ln(distribution): ZkTUfkBiiBiln)(ln+=−=Σβ from (iv) Entropy of N average molecules: ⎟⎟⎠⎞⎜⎜⎝⎛−=−=Σ−=+−=+=Σ=ΣZTkVASNZTNkVASNTUFZNkTVASNZNkTUNNBBBBiiln21ln21lnln222222 Unfortunately, this too must be evaluated numerically: For each value of S find m then calculate Z
| |
| ddmPZβββππsin))(cosexp( where0202∫∫−= Iit turns out that for BkVAT222019.0< the positive S solution has the lowest free energy. Hence BNIT22019.0=
| |
| 1
| |
| -0.5
| |
| T
| |
| 0.43
| |
| 0
| |
| Tmax
| |
| S
| |
| S decreases steadily as T is increased until it suddenly drops to zero at TNI .
| |
| (x)
| |
| TNI is less than TMAX so have first order transition.
| |
| 43.0)(22019.02==NIBNITSkVATA reasonable value compared with experiment.
| |
| 1-K Joules 5.3Joules 5.3=ΔΣ×=ΔNININITU Much weaker than crystal to liquid transition
| |
| Strong angle dependant attraction (large A) increases TNI.
| |
| Dilution (increasing V) decreases TNI.
| |
| Why does it work? We have neglected the shape completely but it seems to give reasonable values.
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| ==References== | | ==References== |
| #W. Maier and A. Saupe "EINE EINFACHE MOLEKULARE THEORIE DES NEMATISCHEN KRISTALLINFLUSSIGEN ZUSTANDES", Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A '''13''' pp. 564- (1958) | | #W. Maier and A. Saupe "EINE EINFACHE MOLEKULARE THEORIE DES NEMATISCHEN KRISTALLINFLUSSIGEN ZUSTANDES", Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A '''13''' pp. 564- (1958) |