Talk:Lebwohl-Lasher model: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I shall have to read the paper more closely... --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride |talk]]) 14:38, 20 February 2009 (CET) | I shall have to read the paper more closely... --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Carl_McBride |talk]]) 14:38, 20 February 2009 (CET) | ||
OK, I thought it was just a typing mistake, --Noe 14:53, 20 February 2009 (CET) | OK, I thought it was just a typing mistake, --Noe 14:53, 20 February 2009 (CET) | ||
---- | |||
I think that the thing with the two asterisks is not the proper transition temperature, but something | |||
different, that they refer to as "divergence temperature" (Do not ask me about the meaning of that). Actually, | |||
according to the abstract of the paper the actual temperature of the transition is not the one is in the page, | |||
but such a "divergence temperature"; Cheers --Noe 15:05, 20 February 2009 (CET) | |||
Revision as of 15:05, 20 February 2009
Spurious asterisk
Re: spurious asterisk: Both in the abstract and in the main body of the paper appears, although on a cursory reading I cannot see where it is defined. I shall have to read the paper more closely... -- Carl McBride (talk) 14:38, 20 February 2009 (CET) OK, I thought it was just a typing mistake, --Noe 14:53, 20 February 2009 (CET)
I think that the thing with the two asterisks is not the proper transition temperature, but something different, that they refer to as "divergence temperature" (Do not ask me about the meaning of that). Actually, according to the abstract of the paper the actual temperature of the transition is not the one is in the page, but such a "divergence temperature"; Cheers --Noe 15:05, 20 February 2009 (CET)