Verlet modified: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
:<math>y(r) = \gamma (r) - A \frac{1}{2} \gamma^2(r)  \left[ \frac{1}{1+ B \gamma(r) /2} \right]</math>
:<math>y(r) = \gamma (r) - A \frac{1}{2} \gamma^2(r)  \left[ \frac{1}{1+ B \gamma(r) /2} \right]</math>


where several sets of values are tried for ''A'' and ''B''  (Note, when ''A=0'' the [[HNC]] is recovered).
where several sets of values are tried for ''A'' and ''B''  (Note, when ''A=0'' the [[HNC| hyper-netted chain]] is recovered).
Later (Ref. 2) (1981) Verlet used a Padé (2/1) approximant (Eq. 6) fitted to obtain the best [[Hard sphere | hard sphere]] results
Later (Ref. 2) (1981) Verlet used a Padé (2/1) approximant (Eq. 6) fitted to obtain the best [[Hard sphere | hard sphere]] results
by minimising the difference between the pressures obtained via the virial and compressibility routes:
by minimising the difference between the pressures obtained via the virial and compressibility routes:

Revision as of 15:02, 26 February 2007

The Verlet modified (1980) (Ref. 1) closure for hard sphere fluids, in terms of the cavity correlation function, is (Eq. 3)

y(r)=γ(r)−A12γ2(r)[11+Bγ(r)/2]

where several sets of values are tried for A and B (Note, when A=0 the hyper-netted chain is recovered). Later (Ref. 2) (1981) Verlet used a Padé (2/1) approximant (Eq. 6) fitted to obtain the best hard sphere results by minimising the difference between the pressures obtained via the virial and compressibility routes:

y(r)=γ(r)−A12γ2(r)[1+λγ(r)1+μγ(r)]

with A=0.80, λ=0.03496 and μ=0.6586.

References

  1. Loup Verlet "Integral equations for classical fluids I. The hard sphere case", Molecular Physics 41 pp. 183-190 (1980)
  2. Loup Verlet "Integral equations for classical fluids II. Hard spheres again", Molecular Physics 42 pp. 1291-1302 (1981)