Talk:Delaunay simplexes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Carl McBride (talk | contribs) (Complex/simplex) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I kind of understand a simplex to be an ''n''-dimensional triangle and a special case of a simplicial complex. However, I do say | I kind of understand a simplex to be an ''n''-dimensional triangle and a special case of a simplicial complex. However, I do say | ||
''kind of understand''. If you know that it is indeed a complex rather than a simplex, the page can be re-named. --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] 16:25, 12 September 2007 (CEST) | ''kind of understand''. If you know that it is indeed a complex rather than a simplex, the page can be re-named. --[[User:Carl McBride | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] 16:25, 12 September 2007 (CEST) | ||
== Triangle/triangulation == | |||
(I should check these pages more often!) Indeed, a simplex is an ''n'' triangle (it has ''n''+1 vertices), but according to the CGAL project documentation a '''triangulation''' is a simplicial complex (not a triangle). Why not just leave it to "triangulation"? I think this is the usual wording. | |||
Revision as of 10:21, 9 October 2007
Isn't this a "complex", not a "simplex"?
Complex/simplex
Hi there Dr. Duque,
I kind of understand a simplex to be an n-dimensional triangle and a special case of a simplicial complex. However, I do say kind of understand. If you know that it is indeed a complex rather than a simplex, the page can be re-named. -- Carl McBride 16:25, 12 September 2007 (CEST)
Triangle/triangulation
(I should check these pages more often!) Indeed, a simplex is an n triangle (it has n+1 vertices), but according to the CGAL project documentation a triangulation is a simplicial complex (not a triangle). Why not just leave it to "triangulation"? I think this is the usual wording.