Cluster algorithms: Difference between revisions

From SklogWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 54: Line 54:
the probability of bonding neighboring sites with equal spins is not set ''a priori''.
the probability of bonding neighboring sites with equal spins is not set ''a priori''.


The algorithm for an Ising system with [[periodic boundary conditions]] can be implemented as follows:
Given a certain configuration of the system:
* We consider the possible bonds on the system (pairs of nearest neighbours with favourable interaction)
* Using [[random numbers]] we asign a random  order to those possible bonds
* The possible bonds are being ''activated''  in the order fixed in the previous step (keeping track of the clusters being defined in the proccess)


== Probability-Changing Cluster Algorithm ==
== Probability-Changing Cluster Algorithm ==

Revision as of 14:52, 7 August 2007

Cluster algorithms are mainly used in the simulation of Ising-like models. The essential feature is the use of collective motions of particles (spins) in a single Monte Carlo step. An interesting property of some of these application is the fact that the percolation analysis of the clusters can be used to study phase transitions.

Swendsen-Wang algorithm

As an introductory example we shall discuss the Swendsen-Wang technique (Ref 1) in the simulation of Ising Models.

Recipe

In one Monte Carlo step of the algorithm the following recipe is used:

  • Consider every pair interacting sites (spins)

In the current configuration the pair interaction can be either negative: or positive , depending on the product: (See Ising Models for details on the notation)

  • For pairs of interacting sites (nearest neighbors) with create a bond between the two spins with a given probability (using random numbers)
will be chosen to be a function of
  • The bonds generated in the previous step are used to build up clusters of sites (spins).
  • Build up the partition of the system in the corresponding clusters of spins.

In each cluster all the spins will have the same state (either or )

  • For each cluster, independently, choose at random with equal probabilities whether to flip (invert the value of ) or not to flip the whole set of spins belonging to the cluster.


The bonding probability is given by:

Wolff algorithm

See Ref 2 for details.

The procedure to create a given bond is the same as in the Swendsen-Wang algorithm. However in Wolff's method the whole set of interacting pairs is not tested to generate (possible) bonds. In stead, a single cluster is built.

  • The initial cluster contains one site (selected at random)
  • Possible bonds between the initial site and other sites of the system are tested:

The bonded sites are included in the cluster

  • Then recursively, one checks the existence of bonds between the new members of the cluster and sites of the system to add, if bonds are generated, new sites to the growing cluster, until no more bonds are generated.
  • At this point, the whole cluster is flipped (see above)

Invaded Cluster Algorithm

(See Ref 3)

The purpose of this algorithm is to locate critical points (critical temperature). So, in this case the probability of bonding neighboring sites with equal spins is not set a priori.

The algorithm for an Ising system with periodic boundary conditions can be implemented as follows:

Given a certain configuration of the system:

  • We consider the possible bonds on the system (pairs of nearest neighbours with favourable interaction)
  • The possible bonds are being activated in the order fixed in the previous step (keeping track of the clusters being defined in the proccess)

Probability-Changing Cluster Algorithm

This method was proposed by Tomita and Okabe (See Ref 4)

Beyond the Ising and Potts models

Application to continuous (atomistic) models

References

  1. Robert H. Swendsen and Jian-Sheng Wang, "Nonuniversal critical dynamics in Monte Carlo simulations", Physical Review Letters 58 pp. 86 - 88 (1987)
  2. Ulli Wolff, "Collective Monte Carlo Updating for Spin Systems" , Physical Review Letters 62 pp. 361 - 364 (1989)
  3. J. Machta, Y. S. Choi, A. Lucke, T. Schweizer, and L. V. Chayes, "Invaded Cluster Algorithm for Equilibrium Critical Points" , Physical Review Letters 75 pp. 2792 - 2795 (1995)
  4. Yusuke Tomita and Yutaka Okabe, "Probability-Changing Cluster Algorithm for Potts Models", Physical Review Letters 86 pp. 572 - 575 (2001)