Intermolecular Interactions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (New page: Most of the molecules cannot be modelled using spherical interactions. Different strategies have been used to represent the anisotropy of intermolecular interactions: == Site-site intermo...) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Stub-general}} | |||
Most of the molecules cannot be modelled using spherical interactions. | Most of the molecules cannot be modelled using spherical interactions. | ||
Different strategies have been used to represent the anisotropy of intermolecular interactions: | Different strategies have been used to represent the anisotropy of intermolecular interactions: | ||
| Line 4: | Line 5: | ||
== Site-site intermolecular potentials == | == Site-site intermolecular potentials == | ||
Within this approach a given molecule is represented by | Within this approach a given molecule is represented by several | ||
interaction sites (which can correspond to atoms, chemical groups, etc.) | interaction sites (which can correspond to atoms, chemical groups, etc.). | ||
These sites can be [[Lennard-Jones model | Lennard-Jones]] centers, point charges, point dipoles, etc. | |||
Latest revision as of 11:24, 27 September 2007
|
This article is a 'stub' page, it has no, or next to no, content. It is here at the moment to help form part of the structure of SklogWiki. If you add sufficient material to this article then please remove the {{Stub-general}} template from this page. |
Most of the molecules cannot be modelled using spherical interactions. Different strategies have been used to represent the anisotropy of intermolecular interactions:
Site-site intermolecular potentials[edit]
Within this approach a given molecule is represented by several interaction sites (which can correspond to atoms, chemical groups, etc.). These sites can be Lennard-Jones centers, point charges, point dipoles, etc.